Official Site - The Legatum Prosperity Index is the world's only global assessment of wealth and wellbeing; unlike other studies that rank countries by actual levels of wealth, life satisfaction or development, the Prosperity Index produces rankings based upon the very foundations of prosperity – those factors that help drive economic growth and produce happy citizens over the long term.
The 2009 Legatum Prosperity Index
Legatum Institute logo

Where to begin?

This table ranks 104 countries, according to their overall abilities to foster the nine drivers of prosperity. It also provides the breakdown of the sub-index performances that lead to the overall rank.

This table is fully-customisable: click on the "Country" column header to order alphabetically, or on any sub-index header to reorder by that indicator of prosperity; click again to reverse the order.

Download the rankings

Sub-index Weightings

Do you have a different perception about the importance of each driver of prosperity? If so, click below and interact with the table to change the weight given to each sub-index. The change in weightings will produce a new set of overall rankings.
#3

Key findings

From this year's Index Freedom cannot be divided

Compare countries

Using the ProsperiscopeTM
Compare

With

 

Country Spotlight

Italy

Ranked 21st
Economic Fundamentals25th
Entrepreneurship & Innovation26th
Democratic Institutions23rd
Education17th
Health11th
Safety and Security31st
Governance35th
Personal Freedom40th
Social Capital37th

The 2009 Legatum Prosperity Index Table Rankings

1Finland1099372276
2Switzerland213122363112
3Sweden16374157553
4Denmark1561221241213
5Norway1817811017110
6Australia7155621141044
7Canada64616229939
8Netherlands3519148158108
9United States1412727191687
10New Zealand271841019131161
11Ireland512131825122512
12United Kingdom13211212322131911
13Belgium42031151615926
14Germany2382119621171719
15Austria12191013110143623
16Japan872020912202240
17France171414151423181548
18Hong Kong1106039181166733
19Spain112515121728211371
20Slovenia3136168248243344
21Italy252623171131354037
22Portugal283122292017252664
23Singapore91186264346476
24Taiwan19212992620433073
25Czech Republic202725311629282374
26South Korea211632303136277031
27=Israel222317252574264178
27=Hungary262226233030294892
29Poland333524273225324568
30Greece42434051332306551
31Estonia302434353533194394
32Costa Rica553328613744381247
33Uruguay675335432826311460
34Slovakia353018363634336969
35Croatia413441403439422846
36Chile364727494827223185
37Latvia323231243838347699
38Argentina534845383945692756
39Malaysia242869524048378352
40Trinidad and Tobago485843734954521834
41Brazil543738586479531662
42Panama467339485741505450
43Mexico342961605172517345
44Thailand373981546658407422
45India43553686888741475
46Bulgaria4045303743464581101
47United Arab Emirates384498472918397277
48Romania5240334147406478102
49Jamaica715156715557732461
50Mongolia577044537635865942
51South Africa584647698296475030
52=Belize744950796161555858
52=Kuwait627183333324448779
54Dominican Republic859059767777622120
55Philippines634167707578662081
56Botswana569237809568233229
57Paraguay876765746550762953
58Sri Lanka818271777297593917
59Macedonia866842574155637188
60El Salvador737468836971583559
61=Indonesia6863587578636110014
61=Ukraine605955326769926889
63Namibia696453858386464627
64Peru4961515181736862104
65Colombia6157706263104494475
66Honduras768863788062716355
67Guatemala847574877182704249
68Tunisia665494505437368696
69=Russia394285284699858884
69=Turkey5056496856834894103
71Ecuador787277655889876165
72Nicaragua969146828466723857
73Bolivia907854638576845366
74Venezuela8385726660931015754
75China2938100645365939170
76Kazakhstan596296424549977587
77Vietnam476097816842758063
78Moldova825257457975898593
79Ghana9410348939353543424
80Jordan6477844659475710383
81Saudi Arabia4481101564256679843
82Mali92995210210143803715
83Morocco515082847359659091
84Senegal1008962999651565228
85Belarus4576102344452988998
86Lebanon756680445290799990
87Bangladesh808675899080605672
88Egypt7265905550649195100
89Zambia10210164989785776021
90Nepal919389918691947718
91Mozambique95987310410060784938
92Uzbekistan8987104726267968280
93Cambodia6510288969870825167
94Iran79699359708810210182
95Kenya10183669591100888425
96Algeria779587677495839795
97Tanzania971007610010284746641
98Nigeria999478949298999216
99Pakistan707979101871018110436
100Cameroon8896959299941037935
101=Central African Rep.9810492103104921005539
101=Yemen1039791889481909386
103Sudan93801039789103959632
104Zimbabwe10484999010310210410297


Comments (388)

Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,    
Raj, Toronto said on the 13th March 2010:
The UN's Human Development Index(HDI) is a better one. There are no subjective elements in it. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income).
Lets compare China and India. In the prosperity index India is at 45 while China is at 75 out of 104 countries. In HDI, China is at 92 and India is at 134 out of 182 countries. Per HDI, China is way ahead of India and improving every year. India on the other hand has deteriorated; was 127 in 2006 and is down to 134 in 2009. The type of government China has has actually helped it since decisions are quicker; the Chinese are nimble footed. However negative the human rights factor is, the one child policy has helped; from the Chinese context it actually made sense to have such a policy in place. The Chinese have a long term vision of becoming a superpower and in that vision the current form of government fits. As China gets richer(or shall we say less poorer), the possibility of democratization will be higher even though it will be slow.
India on the other hand has a democracy which has been problematic. By the way, India does not have a true democracy like the US. About 30% of MPs in the national parliament have a criminal background; you can either buy your way or use arm twisting tactics to get elected. The country does not have a one child policy which is actually problematic resulting in continuing high population growth; though the country's population is young -- median age is 25 compared to China's 33, the population has poor health-- merely being young is not enough.
In India, 47% of children under 5 are malnourished, 79% live on $2 or less a day, 42% live on less than $1.25 a day(absolute poverty),
literacy rate is at 64% -- for women its even worse at 52%. Even in 2050, there will still be absolute poverty in India mainly due to population growth. Life expectancy is at 63 while in China it is 73.
Malnourishment does not exist in China anymore. Literacy rate is at 90%. In about 10 to 15 years, absolute poverty will no longer exist in China. Not being in absolute poverty is better than living in a democracy.
The Chinese dont care about religion; they are more interested in material prosperity. Most dont rue the fact that they are not a democracy. For now, most agree with the government's push towards economic prosperity. The behavior of the nation as a whole clearly indicates that China has a definite long term plan and is implementing it with vigour. This country has a huge ambition to be a super power.
In my opinion, China is doing much better than India, irrespective of what the prosperity index concludes.
Kev said on the 12th March 2010:
Hello, I am a native citizen of Canada. I have just read about your work on the web. May I say that I am going to be interested in doing some research into how organizations like yours and a few others come up with your results, your opinions if I may in goodwill? I say this as I am concerned may I say without prejudice about corruptionn and justice in my own land of Canada and how it is managed in some other countries as well. I think that some do not know for example that in Canada we do not elect our own Senators. They are appointed by the Prime Minister. Judges, senior judges in the federal courts are appointed by who? Once again by the Prime Minister? The head of the National police, Canada's RCMP is appointed by the Prime Minister? The current head of the RCMP was not a former RCMP officer, he was in part the former Chief of Staff to the Deputy Prime Minister of a former Government whose Prime Minister was investigated for possible questionable activity and has been the focus of a mulkti-million dolalr inquiry where the judge carrying out the inquiry was originally appojnted by the former Prime Minister being investigated I understand? Is that what we call judicial independence and democracy? Now just imagine for a momnent what would your group do if they exposed how undemocratic to some this may seem may I ask without malice? And by the way, in Canada we do not even have a National Minister of Education to help ensure national education standards?
MC Pineda, Guyana said on the 11th March 2010:
Why are countries like Guyana and the others in the Caribbean Region not included on the Legatum Prosperity Index?
Administrator responded on the 11th March 2010:
The most common reason why countries are exluded from the Prosperity Index is due to the lack of data available for those countries. However, to answer this and many other questions, please see the FAQ's section located here: http://www.prosperity.com/faqs.aspx
Thank you
Martin, Venezuela said on the 10th March 2010:
I don't understand why there are so many detractors of this study. I think the results of the study do really reflect the reality. If you do not think so, just take sometime to travel around. You will see why Scandinavian countries rank the first position and why other rich countries are not even in the first 20...

Thanks for the study, I think you did a great job
Anonymous said on the 28th February 2010:
Why on earth is this list still on the net. They are using statistics and figures which date from 7 years ago. Next to that, we see some sort of weird bias and interpretation of these figures.
Administrator responded on the 1st March 2010:
Thank you for your interest in the Prosperity Index. The Index is based on data from 2001 to 2007. Data for more recent years were not available during the time of research. Additionally, we would like to include data from previous years in order to capture the long-term trends in the variables, but due to limited data availability, we were not able to obtain this information. However, we are continuously searching for additional datasets, so any suggestions of other sources are always welcome. For more information on the data that we use, please refer to the methodology section and technical appendix here:
http://prosperity.com/report.aspx
Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,    

Add your comment


This page is moderated by an administrator and any comments containing profanity or bigotry of any kind will be removed.

Before you post a comment, why not check out the FAQ section for answers to commonly fielded questions.
Your name:
Your location: